Flud failure

Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

Description

Flud was a social news reader available for iPads, iPhones, Androids and Windows platform. Flud distinguished itself from other news readers because users could save or store articles and news in the reading list for later reading. It was made to display RSS feeds from other blogs or news sites which made it easy for individuals to stream different sources of news - at the same time - on a single platform. Flud was considered as one of the best social news readers because it had a beautiful UI design, users could create profiles, follow other users, create communities and discussions around a topic and become major contributors by sharing their content.

Stats

Category
Productivity
Country
United States
Started
In 2010
Closed
By 2013
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bobby Ghoshal, Matthew Ausonio
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$3.1M
Number of Investors
4
Precise Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

The reason for which Flud joined the graveyard list of failed startups was mainly that they were unable to raise additional funding for their operations. Despite its various ways to raise money (including making it an enterprise), the company failed to become profitable and eventually ran out of cash.

Another reason the company failure could be attributed to was the unreliable volume of demand. The market was already filled with similar products and the competition was too high. When Flud came to be, Flipboard and Pulse were already the leading franchise in the field.

An additional reason the company didn’t ultimately succeed was the lack of initial testing of the product. Moreover, they had sought the press too early on, without having a thoroughly tested product. The large media coverage the app received did Flud more damage than good because people, upon hearing about the app, would download it and try it out. Flud wasn’t expecting to have so many users download the app so soon and en masse, so they had suddenly had to deal with glitches and bugs. Having a faulty app when respected companies were praising it, might have cost them a bit of credibility and stopped the momentum they could have had.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

LuckyUnicorn t-Shirts
We've just launched 20 limited edition Failory t-shirts. Click here to buy one!

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

General Information
Category
Productivity
Country
United States
Started
In 2010
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2013
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bobby Ghoshal, Matthew Ausonio
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$3.1M
Number of Investors
4
Description

Flud was a social news reader available for iPads, iPhones, Androids and Windows platform. Flud distinguished itself from other news readers because users could save or store articles and news in the reading list for later reading. It was made to display RSS feeds from other blogs or news sites which made it easy for individuals to stream different sources of news - at the same time - on a single platform. Flud was considered as one of the best social news readers because it had a beautiful UI design, users could create profiles, follow other users, create communities and discussions around a topic and become major contributors by sharing their content.

Cause of Failure

The reason for which Flud joined the graveyard list of failed startups was mainly that they were unable to raise additional funding for their operations. Despite its various ways to raise money (including making it an enterprise), the company failed to become profitable and eventually ran out of cash.

Another reason the company failure could be attributed to was the unreliable volume of demand. The market was already filled with similar products and the competition was too high. When Flud came to be, Flipboard and Pulse were already the leading franchise in the field.

An additional reason the company didn’t ultimately succeed was the lack of initial testing of the product. Moreover, they had sought the press too early on, without having a thoroughly tested product. The large media coverage the app received did Flud more damage than good because people, upon hearing about the app, would download it and try it out. Flud wasn’t expecting to have so many users download the app so soon and en masse, so they had suddenly had to deal with glitches and bugs. Having a faulty app when respected companies were praising it, might have cost them a bit of credibility and stopped the momentum they could have had.

Go on Reading

Tilt

Social payment startup focused on crowd-funding

Finances
Acquired
$62.1M
Lack of Focus
Finances
United States
In 2012
By 2017
Three
Between 101 And 250
More Than 50M
Lack of Focus
Acquired
SellanApp

Connected creatives with app developers

Finances
Bankruptcy
$961.1K
Failure To Pivot
Finances
The Netherlands
In 2012
By 2015
Two
Between 1 And 10
Less Than 1M
Failure To Pivot
Bankruptcy
Dazo

India's first curated food demand platform

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
No Data
Competition
Food and Beverage
India
In 2015
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
No Data
Competition
Shut Down
LayerVault

Allowed users to store and collaborate on design work

Design
Shut Down
$535K
Lack of Funds
Design
United States
In 2011
By 2014
Two
Between 11 And 50
Less Than 1M
Lack of Funds
Shut Down
Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

Productivity
Shut Down
$3.1M
Multiple Reasons
Productivity
United States
In 2010
By 2013
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Grooveshark

Web-based on-demand music application

Music
Shut Down
$4.6M
Legal Challenges
Music
United States
In 2006
By 2015
Three
Between 51 And 100
Between 1M 10M
Legal Challenges
Shut Down