Flud failure

Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

Description

Flud was a social news reader available for iPads, iPhones, Androids and Windows platform. Flud distinguished itself from other news readers because users could save or store articles and news in the reading list for later reading. It was made to display RSS feeds from other blogs or news sites which made it easy for individuals to stream different sources of news - at the same time - on a single platform. Flud was considered as one of the best social news readers because it had a beautiful UI design, users could create profiles, follow other users, create communities and discussions around a topic and become major contributors by sharing their content.

Stats

Category
Productivity
Country
United States
Started
In 2010
Closed
By 2013
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bobby Ghoshal, Matthew Ausonio
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$3.1M
Number of Investors
4
Precise Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

The reason for which Flud joined the graveyard list of failed startups was mainly that they were unable to raise additional funding for their operations. Despite its various ways to raise money (including making it an enterprise), the company failed to become profitable and eventually ran out of cash.

Another reason the company failure could be attributed to was the unreliable volume of demand. The market was already filled with similar products and the competition was too high. When Flud came to be, Flipboard and Pulse were already the leading franchise in the field.

An additional reason the company didn’t ultimately succeed was the lack of initial testing of the product. Moreover, they had sought the press too early on, without having a thoroughly tested product. The large media coverage the app received did Flud more damage than good because people, upon hearing about the app, would download it and try it out. Flud wasn’t expecting to have so many users download the app so soon and en masse, so they had suddenly had to deal with glitches and bugs. Having a faulty app when respected companies were praising it, might have cost them a bit of credibility and stopped the momentum they could have had.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

Receive our weekly newsletters with the latest startup-related articles and interviews.

Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

General Information
Category
Productivity
Country
United States
Started
In 2010
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2013
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bobby Ghoshal, Matthew Ausonio
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$3.1M
Number of Investors
4
Description

Flud was a social news reader available for iPads, iPhones, Androids and Windows platform. Flud distinguished itself from other news readers because users could save or store articles and news in the reading list for later reading. It was made to display RSS feeds from other blogs or news sites which made it easy for individuals to stream different sources of news - at the same time - on a single platform. Flud was considered as one of the best social news readers because it had a beautiful UI design, users could create profiles, follow other users, create communities and discussions around a topic and become major contributors by sharing their content.

Cause of Failure

The reason for which Flud joined the graveyard list of failed startups was mainly that they were unable to raise additional funding for their operations. Despite its various ways to raise money (including making it an enterprise), the company failed to become profitable and eventually ran out of cash.

Another reason the company failure could be attributed to was the unreliable volume of demand. The market was already filled with similar products and the competition was too high. When Flud came to be, Flipboard and Pulse were already the leading franchise in the field.

An additional reason the company didn’t ultimately succeed was the lack of initial testing of the product. Moreover, they had sought the press too early on, without having a thoroughly tested product. The large media coverage the app received did Flud more damage than good because people, upon hearing about the app, would download it and try it out. Flud wasn’t expecting to have so many users download the app so soon and en masse, so they had suddenly had to deal with glitches and bugs. Having a faulty app when respected companies were praising it, might have cost them a bit of credibility and stopped the momentum they could have had.

Go on Reading

Delicious

Bookmarking website to save, organize and discover links

Productivity
Still Active
No Data
Acquisition Flu
Productivity
United States
In 2003
By 2017
One
Between 51 And 100
No Data
Acquisition Flu
Still Active
Argyle Social

Provided social media management tools

Marketing
Shut Down
$1.6M
Competition
Marketing
United States
In 2010
By 2014
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Competition
Shut Down
TeeBeeDee

Network for people over 40 to share experiences

Social Media
Shut Down
$4.8M
Bad Business Model
Social Media
United States
In 2007
By 2009
Four
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Bad Business Model
Shut Down
Kichit

Brought local chefs to private households

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
$8.1M
Competition
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2011
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Competition
Shut Down
Reach.ly

Analytics tool for e-Commerce sites

Analytics
Shut Down
€200K
Multiple Reasons
Analytics
Latvia
In 2011
By 2015
One
Between 1 And 10
Less Than 1M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Beepi

P2P used car online marketplace

Transportation
Acquired
$149M
Mismanagement of Funds
Transportation
United States
In 2013
By 2016
Two
Between 101 And 250
More Than 50M
Mismanagement of Funds
Acquired