Monitor110 failure

Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

Description

Monitor 110 was an information and data gathering service that offered real-time internet monitoring services for Wall Street. It allowed investors to monitor internet sources for information and insight relevant to their investment and portfolio management. Their algorithm allowed customers to gather data and monitor 40 million online sources so as to get first knowledge of any new trend by essentially ‘listening in’ to online conversations and blogs that included keywords related to the financial market.

Stats

Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2003
Closed
By 2008
Number of Founders
One
Name of Founders
Roger Ehrenberg
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$17.3M
Number of Investors
4
Precise Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Monitor 110 closed down its operations in July 2008 due to various reasons.

First, there wasn’t a clear leadership at the top levels. Monitor110 was directed by two people that had completely different backgrounds - which per se is not a bad thing - but that also had different perspectives when it came to decision making. The company also waited too much before releasing their product also due to the fact that they received substantial publicity (for example, they were featured by the Financial Times) before they had a thoroughly tested release. This got people’s expectation high and made the company reluctant to release a less than perfect product. The fact that they received $17 million might have also been counterproductive for them, as instead of building a lean beta version they kept developing the product in a vacuum based on their vision for it rather than receiving valuable feedback from customers. A technical problem they also faced was related to the amount of spam and duplicate posts that the algorithm was picking up on, it was too much and it could have diminished the value of the platform. When they finally decided on a suitable business pivot after months of indecisiveness, the company had already started running out of money and there was an unpleasant tension between the company team. The company lost also the edge they could have had in such a competitive market as theirs and decided to shut their operations in 2008.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

LuckyUnicorn t-Shirts
We've just launched 20 limited edition Failory t-shirts. Click here to buy one!

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

General Information
Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2003
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2008
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
One
Name of Founders
Roger Ehrenberg
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$17.3M
Number of Investors
4
Description

Monitor 110 was an information and data gathering service that offered real-time internet monitoring services for Wall Street. It allowed investors to monitor internet sources for information and insight relevant to their investment and portfolio management. Their algorithm allowed customers to gather data and monitor 40 million online sources so as to get first knowledge of any new trend by essentially ‘listening in’ to online conversations and blogs that included keywords related to the financial market.

Cause of Failure

Monitor 110 closed down its operations in July 2008 due to various reasons.

First, there wasn’t a clear leadership at the top levels. Monitor110 was directed by two people that had completely different backgrounds - which per se is not a bad thing - but that also had different perspectives when it came to decision making. The company also waited too much before releasing their product also due to the fact that they received substantial publicity (for example, they were featured by the Financial Times) before they had a thoroughly tested release. This got people’s expectation high and made the company reluctant to release a less than perfect product. The fact that they received $17 million might have also been counterproductive for them, as instead of building a lean beta version they kept developing the product in a vacuum based on their vision for it rather than receiving valuable feedback from customers. A technical problem they also faced was related to the amount of spam and duplicate posts that the algorithm was picking up on, it was too much and it could have diminished the value of the platform. When they finally decided on a suitable business pivot after months of indecisiveness, the company had already started running out of money and there was an unpleasant tension between the company team. The company lost also the edge they could have had in such a competitive market as theirs and decided to shut their operations in 2008.

Go on Reading

Tutorspree

Web-based tuition services

Education
Acquired
$1.8M
Bad Marketing
Education
United States
In 2010
By 2013
Three
Between 51 And 100
Between 1M 10M
Bad Marketing
Acquired
LayerVault

Allowed users to store and collaborate on design work

Design
Shut Down
$535K
Lack of Funds
Design
United States
In 2011
By 2014
Two
Between 11 And 50
Less Than 1M
Lack of Funds
Shut Down
Teforia

A tea brewer machine connected with an application

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
$17.1M
No Market Need
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2014
By 2017
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
No Market Need
Shut Down
Fab

Online design marketplace

e-Commerce
Acquired
$336.3M
Multiple Reasons
e-Commerce
United States
In 2009
By 2013
Five
Between 501 And 1000
More Than 50M
Multiple Reasons
Acquired
OpTier

Cloud-based enterprise software business

Analytics
Shut Down
$118.1M
Bad Market Fit
Analytics
United States
In 2002
By 2014
Two
Between 51 And 100
More Than 50M
Bad Market Fit
Shut Down
Mailbox

Inbox that made email light, fast, and mobile-friendly.

Productivity
Shut Down
$5M
Bad Business Model
Productivity
United States
In 2011
By 2015
Two
Between 501 And 1000
Between 1M 10M
Bad Business Model
Shut Down