Monitor110 failure

Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

Description

Monitor 110 was an information and data gathering service that offered real-time internet monitoring services for Wall Street. It allowed investors to monitor internet sources for information and insight relevant to their investment and portfolio management. Their algorithm allowed customers to gather data and monitor 40 million online sources so as to get first knowledge of any new trend by essentially ‘listening in’ to online conversations and blogs that included keywords related to the financial market.

Stats

Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2003
Closed
By 2008
Number of Founders
One
Name of Founders
Roger Ehrenberg
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$17.3M
Number of Investors
4
Precise Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Monitor 110 closed down its operations in July 2008 due to various reasons.

First, there wasn’t a clear leadership at the top levels. Monitor110 was directed by two people that had completely different backgrounds - which per se is not a bad thing - but that also had different perspectives when it came to decision making. The company also waited too much before releasing their product also due to the fact that they received substantial publicity (for example, they were featured by the Financial Times) before they had a thoroughly tested release. This got people’s expectation high and made the company reluctant to release a less than perfect product. The fact that they received $17 million might have also been counterproductive for them, as instead of building a lean beta version they kept developing the product in a vacuum based on their vision for it rather than receiving valuable feedback from customers. A technical problem they also faced was related to the amount of spam and duplicate posts that the algorithm was picking up on, it was too much and it could have diminished the value of the platform. When they finally decided on a suitable business pivot after months of indecisiveness, the company had already started running out of money and there was an unpleasant tension between the company team. The company lost also the edge they could have had in such a competitive market as theirs and decided to shut their operations in 2008.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

Receive our weekly newsletters with the latest startup-related articles and interviews.

Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

General Information
Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2003
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2008
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
One
Name of Founders
Roger Ehrenberg
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$17.3M
Number of Investors
4
Description

Monitor 110 was an information and data gathering service that offered real-time internet monitoring services for Wall Street. It allowed investors to monitor internet sources for information and insight relevant to their investment and portfolio management. Their algorithm allowed customers to gather data and monitor 40 million online sources so as to get first knowledge of any new trend by essentially ‘listening in’ to online conversations and blogs that included keywords related to the financial market.

Cause of Failure

Monitor 110 closed down its operations in July 2008 due to various reasons.

First, there wasn’t a clear leadership at the top levels. Monitor110 was directed by two people that had completely different backgrounds - which per se is not a bad thing - but that also had different perspectives when it came to decision making. The company also waited too much before releasing their product also due to the fact that they received substantial publicity (for example, they were featured by the Financial Times) before they had a thoroughly tested release. This got people’s expectation high and made the company reluctant to release a less than perfect product. The fact that they received $17 million might have also been counterproductive for them, as instead of building a lean beta version they kept developing the product in a vacuum based on their vision for it rather than receiving valuable feedback from customers. A technical problem they also faced was related to the amount of spam and duplicate posts that the algorithm was picking up on, it was too much and it could have diminished the value of the platform. When they finally decided on a suitable business pivot after months of indecisiveness, the company had already started running out of money and there was an unpleasant tension between the company team. The company lost also the edge they could have had in such a competitive market as theirs and decided to shut their operations in 2008.

Go on Reading

Shipbeat

Shipping API for e-commerce companies

e-Commerce
Bankruptcy
€1.2M
Multiple Reasons
e-Commerce
Denmark
In 2014
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Multiple Reasons
Bankruptcy
Dopplr

Social travel network service

Travel
Shut Down
No Data
Acquisition Flu
Travel
United States
In 2007
Active
Five
Between 1 And 10
No Data
Acquisition Flu
Shut Down
Sidecar

Provided B2B delivery transportation network

Transportation
Acquired
$45.5M
Competition
Transportation
United States
In 2011
By 2015
Two
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Competition
Acquired
Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

Analytics
Shut Down
$17.3M
Multiple Reasons
Analytics
United States
In 2003
By 2008
One
Between 1 And 10
Between 10M 50M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
PoliMobile

Empowered campaigns with the power of mobile

Marketing
Shut Down
-
No Market Need
Marketing
United States
In 2011
By 2015
One
Between 1 And 10
Nothing
No Market Need
Shut Down
HiGear

Private car-sharing club for luxury and sports cars

Transportation
Acquired
$1.3M
Legal Challenges
Transportation
United States
In 2011
By 2011
Two
Between 1 And 10
Between 1M 10M
Legal Challenges
Acquired