Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

General Information
Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2003
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2008
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
One
Name of Founders
Roger Ehrenberg
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
3
Total Funding Amount
$17.3M
Number of Investors
4
Description

Monitor 110 was an information and data gathering service that offered real-time internet monitoring services for Wall Street. It allowed investors to monitor internet sources for information and insight relevant to their investment and portfolio management. Their algorithm allowed customers to gather data and monitor 40 million online sources so as to get first knowledge of any new trend by essentially ‘listening in’ to online conversations and blogs that included keywords related to the financial market.

Cause of Failure

Monitor 110 closed down its operations in July 2008 due to various reasons.

First, there wasn’t a clear leadership at the top levels. Monitor110 was directed by two people that had completely different backgrounds - which per se is not a bad thing - but that also had different perspectives when it came to decision making. The company also waited too much before releasing their product also due to the fact that they received substantial publicity (for example, they were featured by the Financial Times) before they had a thoroughly tested release. This got people’s expectation high and made the company reluctant to release a less than perfect product. The fact that they received $17 million might have also been counterproductive for them, as instead of building a lean beta version they kept developing the product in a vacuum based on their vision for it rather than receiving valuable feedback from customers. A technical problem they also faced was related to the amount of spam and duplicate posts that the algorithm was picking up on, it was too much and it could have diminished the value of the platform. When they finally decided on a suitable business pivot after months of indecisiveness, the company had already started running out of money and there was an unpleasant tension between the company team. The company lost also the edge they could have had in such a competitive market as theirs and decided to shut their operations in 2008.

Go on Reading

Rafter

Textbook and course material provider for schools

Education
Acquired
$86M
Competition
Education
United States
In 2006
By 2016
One
Between 51 And 100
More Than 50M
Competition
Acquired
Navdy

Augmented driving device for cars

Transportation
Shut Down
$41.8M
Multiple Reasons
Transportation
United States
In 2013
By 2018
Two
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
MatterFab

Selling affordable solutions for metal 3-D printing

Software and Hardware
Shut Down
$13.2M
Bad Business Model
Software and Hardware
United States
In 2013
By 2019
One
Between 1 And 10
Between 10M 50M
Bad Business Model
Shut Down
Fuhu

Designer and seller of cloud-served softwares

Software and Hardware
Acquired
$66.2M
Mismanagement of Funds
Software and Hardware
United States
In 2006
By 2015
Three
Between 501 And 1000
More Than 50M
Mismanagement of Funds
Acquired
Tilt

Social payment startup focused on crowd-funding

Finances
Acquired
$62.1M
Lack of Focus
Finances
United States
In 2012
By 2017
Three
Between 101 And 250
More Than 50M
Lack of Focus
Acquired
Theranos

Consumer healthcare technology company

Health
Shut Down
$1.4B
Legal Challenges
Health
United States
In 2003
By 2018
One
Between 11 And 50
More Than 50M
Legal Challenges
Shut Down