PepperTap failure

PepperTap

Large and fast grocery delivery service

Description

PepperTap provided online shopping platform that addressed customers' need to buy groceries from local markets by delivering the goods to their doorsteps. It targets buyers from different groups of cities, divided into three tiers. The service helps in solving the problems of long queues in the market, limited parking spaces and manipulative intermediaries. Grofers, their main competitor, focused only on big cities to reduce management costs. Another strong competitor of theirs is BigBasket which manages its own inventory and operates as a mega wholesaler, while PepperTap obtains their inventory from local suppliers.

Stats

Category
Food and Beverage
Country
India
Started
In 2014
Closed
By 2016
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Milind Sharma, Navneet Singh
Number of Employees
Between 1001 And 5000
Number of Funding Rounds
4
Total Funding Amount
$51.2M
Number of Investors
7
Precise Cause of Failure
Poor Product
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Among the reasons why the company shut down even after receiving big investment money from investors, was the deep-seated perception in customers' minds that online platforms should provide cheaper solutions to their needs. To accommodate such expectations, PepperTap offered discounts and sales which were disproportionate to their account strength. PT also failed to weigh the scalability of their project before its full-blast expansion, which caused problems related to technology. For example, certain segments of their products malfunctioned and could not be accessed by customers on the platform.

PepperTap entered the online grocery business without sufficient preparation. It failed to acknowledge the need for deep pockets, large assortment, competitive prices and inventory management.

While 2015 was a great year for startups, and PepperTap was able to find venture capitalists relatively easily, 2016 brought a different scenario. Startups all over the world faced a slowdown in VC activities, and PepperTap had to bow down to the situation. The costs that the company had to bear were high compared to the profit it made. Since they operated without their own inventory, they needed to pay for outsourcing of inventory management plus technology, operation, etc.

PT founders also pointed out that the fact the Indian market was still unprepared for this type of service factored in as a reason that caused them to suspend their operations. The delivery fee for home delivery was seen as too high, particularly in second and third tiers cities or areas where the presence of delivery boys (kirana), was common and proved to be a tough competition to the online platform strategy.

Grocery shopping is also a favorite leisure activity after work among Indians and is often seen as an activity that brings the family together, making it an additional cultural challenge to Internet grocery businesses in India.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

PepperTap

Large and fast grocery delivery service

General Information
Category
Food and Beverage
Country
India
Started
In 2014
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2016
Cause of Failure
Poor Product
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Milind Sharma, Navneet Singh
Number of Employees
Between 1001 And 5000
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
4
Total Funding Amount
$51.2M
Number of Investors
7
Description

PepperTap provided online shopping platform that addressed customers' need to buy groceries from local markets by delivering the goods to their doorsteps. It targets buyers from different groups of cities, divided into three tiers. The service helps in solving the problems of long queues in the market, limited parking spaces and manipulative intermediaries. Grofers, their main competitor, focused only on big cities to reduce management costs. Another strong competitor of theirs is BigBasket which manages its own inventory and operates as a mega wholesaler, while PepperTap obtains their inventory from local suppliers.

Cause of Failure

Among the reasons why the company shut down even after receiving big investment money from investors, was the deep-seated perception in customers' minds that online platforms should provide cheaper solutions to their needs. To accommodate such expectations, PepperTap offered discounts and sales which were disproportionate to their account strength. PT also failed to weigh the scalability of their project before its full-blast expansion, which caused problems related to technology. For example, certain segments of their products malfunctioned and could not be accessed by customers on the platform.

PepperTap entered the online grocery business without sufficient preparation. It failed to acknowledge the need for deep pockets, large assortment, competitive prices and inventory management.

While 2015 was a great year for startups, and PepperTap was able to find venture capitalists relatively easily, 2016 brought a different scenario. Startups all over the world faced a slowdown in VC activities, and PepperTap had to bow down to the situation. The costs that the company had to bear were high compared to the profit it made. Since they operated without their own inventory, they needed to pay for outsourcing of inventory management plus technology, operation, etc.

PT founders also pointed out that the fact the Indian market was still unprepared for this type of service factored in as a reason that caused them to suspend their operations. The delivery fee for home delivery was seen as too high, particularly in second and third tiers cities or areas where the presence of delivery boys (kirana), was common and proved to be a tough competition to the online platform strategy.

Grocery shopping is also a favorite leisure activity after work among Indians and is often seen as an activity that brings the family together, making it an additional cultural challenge to Internet grocery businesses in India.

Go on Reading

Vine

Platform to share short looping video clips

Social Media
Shut Down
No Data
Multiple Reasons
Social Media
United States
In 2012
By 2017
Three
Between 51 And 100
No Data
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Alikolo

Online marketplace organization

e-Commerce
Shut Down
$100K
Lack of Experience
e-Commerce
Indonesia
In 2014
By 2015
One
Between 1 And 10
Less Than 1M
Lack of Experience
Shut Down
Brisk

Built tools for sales organizations

Marketing
Shut Down
$137K
Lack of Focus
Marketing
Sweden
In 2012
By 2016
Four
Between 11 And 50
Less Than 1M
Lack of Focus
Shut Down
Circa

Mobile news app on diverse topics

Productivity
Acquired
$4.7M
Multiple Reasons
Productivity
United States
In 2011
By 2015
Three
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Multiple Reasons
Acquired
PoliMobile

Empowered campaigns with the power of mobile

Marketing
Shut Down
-
No Market Need
Marketing
United States
In 2011
By 2015
One
Between 1 And 10
Nothing
No Market Need
Shut Down
Beepi

P2P used car online marketplace

Transportation
Acquired
$149M
Mismanagement of Funds
Transportation
United States
In 2013
By 2016
Two
Between 101 And 250
More Than 50M
Mismanagement of Funds
Acquired