Design Inc. failure

Design Inc.

Marketplace for high-quality design work

Description

Design Inc. was a startup that linked clients to talented designers. Clients would post on the site the projects they needed to get done. Design Inc. allowed designers to autonomously send proposals for the projects they would like to work on while charging a small fee for it. The platform helped designers all over the world to find their dream projects and companies were happy to be able to choose from a talented pool of designers.

Stats

Category
Design
Country
United States
Started
In 2016
Closed
By 2017
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bjoern Zinssmeister, Marc Hemeon
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$2.3M
Number of Investors
No Data
Precise Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Design Inc. reached market saturation after some time. The number of projects and companies were not increasing and the startup could not make enough revenue to cover operation costs. This put the company in a low cash situation and they founder took the decision to close it down.

Design Inc. CEO identified a number of reasons that he believed contributed to the failure of his company. He stated that he should have been more focused on the essentials of business, which is getting more leads and profit. He also mentioned that a startup founder should also test his assumptions and keep on optimizing the product in every little way. Team members should also be encouraged to experiment without fear.

Another broader issue that is not exclusively linked to Design Inc. may be with the business model itself since the design field is considered a top-end market where job posts are scarce by nature. Too many designers compete for only a limited number of design jobs, thus causing the market to saturate too soon. Another reason why the company might have not witnessed a growth in its network could have been due to the fact that although designers are introduced to the clients by Design Inc. platform, in the end, they might decide to continue their business transactions independently from the marketplace.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Design Inc.

Marketplace for high-quality design work

General Information
Category
Design
Country
United States
Started
In 2016
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2017
Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Bjoern Zinssmeister, Marc Hemeon
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$2.3M
Number of Investors
No Data
Description

Design Inc. was a startup that linked clients to talented designers. Clients would post on the site the projects they needed to get done. Design Inc. allowed designers to autonomously send proposals for the projects they would like to work on while charging a small fee for it. The platform helped designers all over the world to find their dream projects and companies were happy to be able to choose from a talented pool of designers.

Cause of Failure

Design Inc. reached market saturation after some time. The number of projects and companies were not increasing and the startup could not make enough revenue to cover operation costs. This put the company in a low cash situation and they founder took the decision to close it down.

Design Inc. CEO identified a number of reasons that he believed contributed to the failure of his company. He stated that he should have been more focused on the essentials of business, which is getting more leads and profit. He also mentioned that a startup founder should also test his assumptions and keep on optimizing the product in every little way. Team members should also be encouraged to experiment without fear.

Another broader issue that is not exclusively linked to Design Inc. may be with the business model itself since the design field is considered a top-end market where job posts are scarce by nature. Too many designers compete for only a limited number of design jobs, thus causing the market to saturate too soon. Another reason why the company might have not witnessed a growth in its network could have been due to the fact that although designers are introduced to the clients by Design Inc. platform, in the end, they might decide to continue their business transactions independently from the marketplace.

Go on Reading

MySpace

Social network based on personal user pages

Social Media
Still Active
$37.8M
Multiple Reasons
Social Media
United States
In 2003
Active
Seven
Between 251 And 500
Between 10M 50M
Multiple Reasons
Still Active
RoomsTonite

Las-minute hotel booking provider

Travel
Bankruptcy
$1.5M
Lack of Funds
Travel
India
In 2014
By 2017
One
Between 101 And 250
Between 1M 10M
Lack of Funds
Bankruptcy
Admazely

Easy-to-setup retargeting for web shops

Marketing
Bankruptcy
$600K
Lack of Funds
Marketing
Denmark
In 2011
By 2013
Four
Between 1 And 10
Less Than 1M
Lack of Funds
Bankruptcy
Netscape

Developed enterprise software solutions

Productivity
Shut Down
No Data
Poor Product
Productivity
United States
In 1994
By 2008
Three
Between 5001 And 10000
No Data
Poor Product
Shut Down
Teforia

A tea brewer machine connected with an application

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
$17.1M
No Market Need
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2014
By 2017
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
No Market Need
Shut Down
Juicero

First home cold-pressed juicing system

Food and Beverage
Bankruptcy
$118.5M
Bad Business Model
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2013
By 2017
One
Between 101 And 250
More Than 50M
Bad Business Model
Bankruptcy