Dinner Lab failure

Dinner Lab

Membership-based social dining experiment

Description

Dinner Lab had an intriguing approach to the on-demand food market. What Dinner Lab offered was a culinary experience that would take diners away from the traditional dining experience and let them share new dishes with a group of strangers in unusual places. People could sign up for a membership plan and would receive an invitation, ideally 2 to 4 times a month, to take part of a unique experience enriched by exotic food and new people.

Stats

Category
Food and Beverage
Country
United States
Started
In 2011
Closed
By 2016
Number of Founders
Three
Name of Founders
Brian Bordainick, Francisco Robert, Zach Kupperman
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Number of Funding Rounds
2
Total Funding Amount
$9.1M
Number of Investors
5
Precise Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

The first problem Dinner Lab encountered had to do with the timing at which they offered the meals. Originally, the event would take place at midnight, but pretty soon the company team discovered people at 12:00 am of a weekend tended to be drunk and were both unreliable customers and not really enhancing the experience of the other participants. So, although the idea sounded adventurous and fun, it was impractical and people aren’t used to dine at midnight.

According to Dinner Lab CEO, the company was very challenging to manage as there always was a multitude of variables they had to keep up with, from the food served and its ingredients, to the location, diners registration and turnaround and the staff kept on changing.

Although most customers enjoyed the experience, people complained that there were never enough tickets and never enough events going on. In some cities, people who signed up for a membership which would include at least 2 events per month, ended up having only 1 event every 6 weeks while still having to pay a full subscription.

Dinner Lab blamed the difficulty of having more events on the dwindling running capital. They decided to hire contract workers instead of full-timers with the hope that would decrease the cost. Dinner Lab also tried to sell diners’ surveys to restaurants but without success. They finally found the model unsustainable and closed in 2016 after 5 years of operations.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Dinner Lab

Membership-based social dining experiment

General Information
Category
Food and Beverage
Country
United States
Started
In 2011
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2016
Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Three
Name of Founders
Brian Bordainick, Francisco Robert, Zach Kupperman
Number of Employees
Between 11 And 50
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
2
Total Funding Amount
$9.1M
Number of Investors
5
Description

Dinner Lab had an intriguing approach to the on-demand food market. What Dinner Lab offered was a culinary experience that would take diners away from the traditional dining experience and let them share new dishes with a group of strangers in unusual places. People could sign up for a membership plan and would receive an invitation, ideally 2 to 4 times a month, to take part of a unique experience enriched by exotic food and new people.

Cause of Failure

The first problem Dinner Lab encountered had to do with the timing at which they offered the meals. Originally, the event would take place at midnight, but pretty soon the company team discovered people at 12:00 am of a weekend tended to be drunk and were both unreliable customers and not really enhancing the experience of the other participants. So, although the idea sounded adventurous and fun, it was impractical and people aren’t used to dine at midnight.

According to Dinner Lab CEO, the company was very challenging to manage as there always was a multitude of variables they had to keep up with, from the food served and its ingredients, to the location, diners registration and turnaround and the staff kept on changing.

Although most customers enjoyed the experience, people complained that there were never enough tickets and never enough events going on. In some cities, people who signed up for a membership which would include at least 2 events per month, ended up having only 1 event every 6 weeks while still having to pay a full subscription.

Dinner Lab blamed the difficulty of having more events on the dwindling running capital. They decided to hire contract workers instead of full-timers with the hope that would decrease the cost. Dinner Lab also tried to sell diners’ surveys to restaurants but without success. They finally found the model unsustainable and closed in 2016 after 5 years of operations.

Go on Reading

Flud

Social news reader for different platforms

Productivity
Shut Down
$3.1M
Multiple Reasons
Productivity
United States
In 2010
By 2013
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Zulily

Online retailer that offered daily deals

e-Commerce
Shut Down
$194.6M
Bad Marketing
e-Commerce
United States
In 2009
By 2014
Two
Between 1001 And 5000
More Than 50M
Bad Marketing
Shut Down
Wesabe

Personal finance management website

Finances
Shut Down
$4.7M
Bad Management
Finances
United States
In 2005
By 2010
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Bad Management
Shut Down
Sidecar

Provided B2B delivery transportation network

Transportation
Acquired
$45.5M
Competition
Transportation
United States
In 2011
By 2015
Two
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Competition
Acquired
Sprig

Online app that provided healthy organic meals

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
$56.7M
Competition
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2013
By 2017
Four
Between 51 And 100
More Than 50M
Competition
Shut Down
Move Loot

Furniture online marketplace

e-Commerce
Shut Down
$21.8M
Bad Business Model
e-Commerce
United States
In 2013
By 2016
Four
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Bad Business Model
Shut Down