Vine failure

Vine

Platform to share short looping video clips

Description

Vine was a video hosting social platform that allowed users to share six-second videos on the internet. Its video looping feature lured users into watching hours of funny, silly or creative content and the shareability factor helped the app gain popularity in a short amount of time. Random people could instantly become Vine stars and celebrities could use the medium to promote their brand in a fun and new way. Vine was acquired by Twitter for $30 million even before its first official launch. Videos recorded with the Vine app were then only shearable on Twitter or could be kept on the camera roll.

Stats

Category
Social Media
Country
United States
Started
In 2012
Closed
By 2017
Number of Founders
Three
Name of Founders
Colin Kroll, Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov
Number of Employees
Between 51 And 100
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
No Data
Number of Investors
2
Precise Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Some state that the very acquisition of Vine by Twitter, which initially brought about a wave of optimism, somehow tramped the potential growth of this video sharing service.

There’s also the fact that Vine ‘remained true to itself’ or, as others would say, failed to listen to the needs of its users to grow and develop as it user base increased and became more demanding. The failure in meeting the market needs also debilitated its ability to compete with other emerging video-centered applications such as Instagram and Snapchat.

And last but not least, Vine couldn’t find a sustainable business model as advertisers seemed to find the platform unsuitable for product promotion and Vine couldn’t manage to offer a shared revenue to video creators on the platform as YouTube did. Furthermore, whenever users gained a certain amount of popularity it wasn’t unusual that they would seek to build on that fame on other platforms and eventually discontinue their presence on Vine as the number of downloads and active users on the platform continued to decline.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

Receive our weekly newsletters with the latest startup-related articles and interviews.

Vine

Platform to share short looping video clips

General Information
Category
Social Media
Country
United States
Started
In 2012
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2017
Cause of Failure
Multiple Reasons
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Three
Name of Founders
Colin Kroll, Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov
Number of Employees
Between 51 And 100
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
No Data
Number of Investors
2
Description

Vine was a video hosting social platform that allowed users to share six-second videos on the internet. Its video looping feature lured users into watching hours of funny, silly or creative content and the shareability factor helped the app gain popularity in a short amount of time. Random people could instantly become Vine stars and celebrities could use the medium to promote their brand in a fun and new way. Vine was acquired by Twitter for $30 million even before its first official launch. Videos recorded with the Vine app were then only shearable on Twitter or could be kept on the camera roll.

Cause of Failure

Some state that the very acquisition of Vine by Twitter, which initially brought about a wave of optimism, somehow tramped the potential growth of this video sharing service.

There’s also the fact that Vine ‘remained true to itself’ or, as others would say, failed to listen to the needs of its users to grow and develop as it user base increased and became more demanding. The failure in meeting the market needs also debilitated its ability to compete with other emerging video-centered applications such as Instagram and Snapchat.

And last but not least, Vine couldn’t find a sustainable business model as advertisers seemed to find the platform unsuitable for product promotion and Vine couldn’t manage to offer a shared revenue to video creators on the platform as YouTube did. Furthermore, whenever users gained a certain amount of popularity it wasn’t unusual that they would seek to build on that fame on other platforms and eventually discontinue their presence on Vine as the number of downloads and active users on the platform continued to decline.

Go on Reading

Pixate

Platform for mobile interaction design

Design
Shut Down
$3.8M
Acquisition Flu
Design
United States
In 2012
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Acquisition Flu
Shut Down
Monitor110

Real-time internet monitoring services

Analytics
Shut Down
$17.3M
Multiple Reasons
Analytics
United States
In 2003
By 2008
One
Between 1 And 10
Between 10M 50M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Dazo

India's first curated food demand platform

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
No Data
Competition
Food and Beverage
India
In 2015
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
No Data
Competition
Shut Down
Grooveshark

Web-based on-demand music application

Music
Shut Down
$4.6M
Legal Challenges
Music
United States
In 2006
By 2015
Three
Between 51 And 100
Between 1M 10M
Legal Challenges
Shut Down
Shuddle

Safe on-demand transportation for families

Transportation
Shut Down
$12.2M
Lack of Funds
Transportation
United States
In 2014
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
Lack of Funds
Shut Down
Gowalla

Social Guide to world's cities

Social Media
Acquired
$10.4M
Competition
Social Media
United States
In 2007
By 2013
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
Competition
Acquired