Maple failure

Maple

High-quality food delivery startup

Description

Maple was a startup that prepared and delivered meals in New York. It provided its customer with complimentary maple sugar cookie in every order made. Unlike others companies, maple gave full restaurant experience for it had its own apps, delivery staff, and kitchens. The idea was to have top chefs prepare the main menu and have satellite kitchens provide the complementary dishes. Since the business didn’t have to incur in the high expenses that come when opening an actual restaurant, they could afford to provide premium dishes at an affordable price.

Stats

Category
Food and Beverage
Country
United States
Started
In 2014
Closed
By 2017
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Akshay Navle, Caleb Merkl
Number of Employees
Between 101 And 250
Number of Funding Rounds
2
Total Funding Amount
$29M
Number of Investors
8
Precise Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Business Outcome
Acquired

Cause of Failure

Maple’s original plan when they started out in 2015 was to offer customer great food at reasonable prices. However, leaked reports from the company revealed that Maple was losing money on each delivered meal and it only began making a 30 cents profit on meals from 2016. Although they first relied on their investor’s fundings to cover operational costs, the forecasted losses were too high and they wouldn't be able to sustain it. So, they increased the price, added delivery fee and changed ways of computing sales tax. This sudden price increases led many customers to shift to other providers that offered the same or better services for less money.

Maple also spent a lot to buy expensive grass-fed beef, antibiotic-free chicken and also imported pricey oils. Some sources claim that Maple lacked the operational chops to prepare and deliver meals on scale while maintaining quality and producing a profit. Maple kitchens were also not well equipped to cook 10,000 meals a day.

Furthermore, when Maple launched they used to give a complimentary maple sugar cookie, afterward they withdrew them saying that they were moving away from all kinds of non-natural products to good simple food. This might have ulteriorly displeased customers that became accustomed to the signature free of charge cookie after each order.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

LuckyUnicorn t-Shirts
We've just launched 20 limited edition Failory t-shirts. Click here to buy one!

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Maple

High-quality food delivery startup

General Information
Category
Food and Beverage
Country
United States
Started
In 2014
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Acquired
Closed
By 2017
Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Two
Name of Founders
Akshay Navle, Caleb Merkl
Number of Employees
Between 101 And 250
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
2
Total Funding Amount
$29M
Number of Investors
8
Description

Maple was a startup that prepared and delivered meals in New York. It provided its customer with complimentary maple sugar cookie in every order made. Unlike others companies, maple gave full restaurant experience for it had its own apps, delivery staff, and kitchens. The idea was to have top chefs prepare the main menu and have satellite kitchens provide the complementary dishes. Since the business didn’t have to incur in the high expenses that come when opening an actual restaurant, they could afford to provide premium dishes at an affordable price.

Cause of Failure

Maple’s original plan when they started out in 2015 was to offer customer great food at reasonable prices. However, leaked reports from the company revealed that Maple was losing money on each delivered meal and it only began making a 30 cents profit on meals from 2016. Although they first relied on their investor’s fundings to cover operational costs, the forecasted losses were too high and they wouldn't be able to sustain it. So, they increased the price, added delivery fee and changed ways of computing sales tax. This sudden price increases led many customers to shift to other providers that offered the same or better services for less money.

Maple also spent a lot to buy expensive grass-fed beef, antibiotic-free chicken and also imported pricey oils. Some sources claim that Maple lacked the operational chops to prepare and deliver meals on scale while maintaining quality and producing a profit. Maple kitchens were also not well equipped to cook 10,000 meals a day.

Furthermore, when Maple launched they used to give a complimentary maple sugar cookie, afterward they withdrew them saying that they were moving away from all kinds of non-natural products to good simple food. This might have ulteriorly displeased customers that became accustomed to the signature free of charge cookie after each order.

Go on Reading

BitPass

Online payment system for digital content

Finances
Shut Down
$13.3M
Competition
Finances
United States
In 2002
By 2007
One
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Competition
Shut Down
Aria Insights

Air vehicles for search and rescue missions

Software and Hardware
Shut Down
$39M
Multiple Reasons
Software and Hardware
United States
In 2008
By 2019
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
Multiple Reasons
Shut Down
Zirtual

Dedicated virtual assistants for busy professionals

Software and Hardware
Shut Down
$5.5M
Mismanagement of Funds
Software and Hardware
United States
In 2011
By 2015
Three
Between 101 And 250
Between 1M 10M
Mismanagement of Funds
Shut Down
Alikolo

Online marketplace organization

e-Commerce
Shut Down
$100K
Lack of Experience
e-Commerce
Indonesia
In 2014
By 2015
One
Between 1 And 10
Less Than 1M
Lack of Experience
Shut Down
SpoonRocket

Next-gen, ultra-fast delivery platform

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
$13.5M
Competition
Food and Beverage
United States
In 2013
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
Competition
Shut Down
Berg

Commercialized cloud services for hardware innovators

Design
Shut Down
$1.3M
No Market Need
Design
United Kingdom
In 2005
By 2014
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
No Market Need
Shut Down