Poliana failure

Poliana

Web application that simplified the legislative system

Description

Poliana established with an aim of bringing order to the chaos in the political system of the United States of America. It initially tried to do that by providing a gateway for communication between politicians and their citizens. After the pivot, they started creating and designing data visualization tool using their data set for institutions like schools. Also, they created a paid access terminal that assisted people to make their own data visualization. Poliana also tried to sell information and data visualization to media groups in small and large scale depending on their audience. In particular, they collected data on who exactly funded politicians so as to create transparency and a better understanding of who’s agenda a particular politician was trying to implement since there was a high correlation between the source of the funding politicians receive and the bills they would pass (or prevent from passing).

Stats

Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2013
Closed
By 2015
Number of Founders
Four
Name of Founders
Grayson Carroll, Patrick Cason, Seth Whiting, Shawn Whiting
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$15K
Number of Investors
2
Precise Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Poliana had low market demand and ran out of finances even though they tried to implement three different business models with schools, news agencies and the public at large.

The idea of creating a data visualization tool for school and university students did not work. To penetrate in the schools required strong connection to the school administrators, which the company did not have. It was difficult to make money from projects that were meant to be free to the public. There was no demand for viewing graphs which the public had to pay for first. Poliana allowed the public to see the graphs, but to make their own data they had to pay via SaaS model thus incurring expensive charges. Poliana also attempts with local news media were unsuccessful as they had little interest in what the company offered while middle news media were interested but lacked the budget for visualization data technology. International and national media had their own set of experts and data hence the information offered by the company was irrelevant.

There was a fourth profit model that was suggested by many users but which Poliana decided not to pursue. The model involved selling visualization data and information to politicians. The Poliana team argued that the model might compromise their ethics and go against their very principles when they started the project hence they refrained from creating it. Poliana decided to share their code and open source it in its entirety and suspended their operations in 2015.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

LuckyUnicorn t-Shirts
We've just launched 20 limited edition Failory t-shirts. Click here to buy one!

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Poliana

Web application that simplified the legislative system

General Information
Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2013
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2015
Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Four
Name of Founders
Grayson Carroll, Patrick Cason, Seth Whiting, Shawn Whiting
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$15K
Number of Investors
2
Description

Poliana established with an aim of bringing order to the chaos in the political system of the United States of America. It initially tried to do that by providing a gateway for communication between politicians and their citizens. After the pivot, they started creating and designing data visualization tool using their data set for institutions like schools. Also, they created a paid access terminal that assisted people to make their own data visualization. Poliana also tried to sell information and data visualization to media groups in small and large scale depending on their audience. In particular, they collected data on who exactly funded politicians so as to create transparency and a better understanding of who’s agenda a particular politician was trying to implement since there was a high correlation between the source of the funding politicians receive and the bills they would pass (or prevent from passing).

Cause of Failure

Poliana had low market demand and ran out of finances even though they tried to implement three different business models with schools, news agencies and the public at large.

The idea of creating a data visualization tool for school and university students did not work. To penetrate in the schools required strong connection to the school administrators, which the company did not have. It was difficult to make money from projects that were meant to be free to the public. There was no demand for viewing graphs which the public had to pay for first. Poliana allowed the public to see the graphs, but to make their own data they had to pay via SaaS model thus incurring expensive charges. Poliana also attempts with local news media were unsuccessful as they had little interest in what the company offered while middle news media were interested but lacked the budget for visualization data technology. International and national media had their own set of experts and data hence the information offered by the company was irrelevant.

There was a fourth profit model that was suggested by many users but which Poliana decided not to pursue. The model involved selling visualization data and information to politicians. The Poliana team argued that the model might compromise their ethics and go against their very principles when they started the project hence they refrained from creating it. Poliana decided to share their code and open source it in its entirety and suspended their operations in 2015.

Go on Reading

Crowdmix

Music streaming and sharing platform

Music
Acquired
£14M
Mismanagement of Funds
Music
United Kingdom
In 2013
By 2016
Two
Between 101 And 250
Between 10M 50M
Mismanagement of Funds
Acquired
Salorix

Online social network engagement platform

Analytics
Shut Down
$3.5M
Bad Management
Analytics
United States
In 2009
By 2014
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Bad Management
Shut Down
OpTier

Cloud-based enterprise software business

Analytics
Shut Down
$118.1M
Bad Market Fit
Analytics
United States
In 2002
By 2014
Two
Between 51 And 100
More Than 50M
Bad Market Fit
Shut Down
Wattage

Online platform that made creating hardware easy

Software and Hardware
Shut Down
$200K
No Market Need
Software and Hardware
Canada
In 2014
By 2015
Three
Between 51 And 100
Less Than 1M
No Market Need
Shut Down
LayerVault

Allowed users to store and collaborate on design work

Design
Shut Down
$535K
Lack of Funds
Design
United States
In 2011
By 2014
Two
Between 11 And 50
Less Than 1M
Lack of Funds
Shut Down
Dazo

India's first curated food demand platform

Food and Beverage
Shut Down
No Data
Competition
Food and Beverage
India
In 2015
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
No Data
Competition
Shut Down