Poliana failure

Poliana

Web application that simplified the legislative system

Description

Poliana established with an aim of bringing order to the chaos in the political system of the United States of America. It initially tried to do that by providing a gateway for communication between politicians and their citizens. After the pivot, they started creating and designing data visualization tool using their data set for institutions like schools. Also, they created a paid access terminal that assisted people to make their own data visualization. Poliana also tried to sell information and data visualization to media groups in small and large scale depending on their audience. In particular, they collected data on who exactly funded politicians so as to create transparency and a better understanding of who’s agenda a particular politician was trying to implement since there was a high correlation between the source of the funding politicians receive and the bills they would pass (or prevent from passing).

Stats

Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2013
Closed
By 2015
Number of Founders
Four
Name of Founders
Grayson Carroll, Patrick Cason, Seth Whiting, Shawn Whiting
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$15K
Number of Investors
2
Precise Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Business Outcome
Shut Down

Cause of Failure

Poliana had low market demand and ran out of finances even though they tried to implement three different business models with schools, news agencies and the public at large.

The idea of creating a data visualization tool for school and university students did not work. To penetrate in the schools required strong connection to the school administrators, which the company did not have. It was difficult to make money from projects that were meant to be free to the public. There was no demand for viewing graphs which the public had to pay for first. Poliana allowed the public to see the graphs, but to make their own data they had to pay via SaaS model thus incurring expensive charges. Poliana also attempts with local news media were unsuccessful as they had little interest in what the company offered while middle news media were interested but lacked the budget for visualization data technology. International and national media had their own set of experts and data hence the information offered by the company was irrelevant.

There was a fourth profit model that was suggested by many users but which Poliana decided not to pursue. The model involved selling visualization data and information to politicians. The Poliana team argued that the model might compromise their ethics and go against their very principles when they started the project hence they refrained from creating it. Poliana decided to share their code and open source it in its entirety and suspended their operations in 2015.

Go on Reading

Other Startups

Startup Cemetery

A big resource for entrepreneurs and startup owners, in which we have collected and analyzed why +100 big companies have failed. Learn from mistakes, and avoid being part of the 90% of businesses that fail.

Poliana

Web application that simplified the legislative system

General Information
Category
Analytics
Country
United States
Started
In 2013
Business Failure
Business Outcome
Shut Down
Closed
By 2015
Cause of Failure
Bad Business Model
Founders & Employees
Number of Founders
Four
Name of Founders
Grayson Carroll, Patrick Cason, Seth Whiting, Shawn Whiting
Number of Employees
Between 1 And 10
Funding
Number of Funding Rounds
1
Total Funding Amount
$15K
Number of Investors
2
Description

Poliana established with an aim of bringing order to the chaos in the political system of the United States of America. It initially tried to do that by providing a gateway for communication between politicians and their citizens. After the pivot, they started creating and designing data visualization tool using their data set for institutions like schools. Also, they created a paid access terminal that assisted people to make their own data visualization. Poliana also tried to sell information and data visualization to media groups in small and large scale depending on their audience. In particular, they collected data on who exactly funded politicians so as to create transparency and a better understanding of who’s agenda a particular politician was trying to implement since there was a high correlation between the source of the funding politicians receive and the bills they would pass (or prevent from passing).

Cause of Failure

Poliana had low market demand and ran out of finances even though they tried to implement three different business models with schools, news agencies and the public at large.

The idea of creating a data visualization tool for school and university students did not work. To penetrate in the schools required strong connection to the school administrators, which the company did not have. It was difficult to make money from projects that were meant to be free to the public. There was no demand for viewing graphs which the public had to pay for first. Poliana allowed the public to see the graphs, but to make their own data they had to pay via SaaS model thus incurring expensive charges. Poliana also attempts with local news media were unsuccessful as they had little interest in what the company offered while middle news media were interested but lacked the budget for visualization data technology. International and national media had their own set of experts and data hence the information offered by the company was irrelevant.

There was a fourth profit model that was suggested by many users but which Poliana decided not to pursue. The model involved selling visualization data and information to politicians. The Poliana team argued that the model might compromise their ethics and go against their very principles when they started the project hence they refrained from creating it. Poliana decided to share their code and open source it in its entirety and suspended their operations in 2015.

Go on Reading

Friendster

Social gaming site focused on entertainment

Social Media
Shut Down
$48.5M
Bad Market Fit
Social Media
Philippines
In 2001
By 2015
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 10M 50M
Bad Market Fit
Shut Down
Lookery

Demographic marketing services in social networks

Marketing
Acquired
$3.2M
Dependence on Others
Marketing
United States
In 2007
By 2009
Three
Between 1 And 10
Between 1M 10M
Dependence on Others
Acquired
Zoomo

P2P transactions of pre-owned cars

Transportation
Shut Down
$6M
Bad Business Model
Transportation
India
In 2014
By 2016
Two
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
Bad Business Model
Shut Down
Moped

Free messaging application

Social Media
Acquired
$1M
No Market Need
Social Media
Germany
In 1998
By 2014
One
Between 11 And 50
Between 1M 10M
No Market Need
Acquired
Kiko

Ajax-style online calendar application

Productivity
Acquired
$50K
Bad Management
Productivity
United States
In 2003
By 2008
Two
Between 11 And 50
Less Than 1M
Bad Management
Acquired
Karhoo

Cab aggregator and price comparison tool

Transportation
Acquired
$39M
Poor Product
Transportation
United Kingdom
In 2014
By 2016
One
Between 51 And 100
Between 10M 50M
Poor Product
Acquired